Category: Jerry’s Blog and Articles

  • Legacy of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem: The Perpetual Challenge of Palestinian Violence

    As Israelis endure a brutal assault by Hamas, it’s imperative to examine the life and legacy of one of the most influential antisemites (besides Hitler) of the 20th century, shedding light on the true origins of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    This conflict’s deep-seated roots can be attributed to a single individual – Haj Amin al-Husseini. In 1921, under British rule in the Middle East, he was appointed the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. This seemingly innocuous decision would have far-reaching consequences, as it laid the groundwork for the emergence of the Arab nationalist movement in Palestine.

    However, al-Husseini was not merely a political figure. He was a fervent antisemite and went on to become the Arab world’s most significant collaborator with the Nazis during World War II. His tireless efforts were directed toward the ethnic cleansing and annihilation of Jews in Palestine and across the Middle East. The impact of his influence and rhetoric resulted in countless attacks and massacres of Jews, akin to the pogroms witnessed in Eastern Europe.

    Al-Husseini’s legacy extends beyond founding Palestinian nationalism and terrorism; he shaped it into an ideology of absolute rejectionism and even genocide. He vehemently denied Jews any national rights, especially in British Mandate Palestine, and advocated for their death and extermination across all Arab lands long before Hitler’s Holocaust.

    Today, al-Husseini’s ideology remains a significant obstacle to peace in the Middle East. Understanding his influence provides insights into why Palestinians, despite numerous opportunities for peace, continue to prioritize the annihilation of Jews over territorial negotiations.

    During World War II, al-Husseini served as an advisor to Hitler and resided in Germany, aligning himself with the Nazi regime’s goals of conquest and genocide. His openly genocidal rhetoric extended to planning death camps for Jews in Palestine and Arab nations, envisioning a Middle Eastern Holocaust after Hitler’s victory.

    Fortunately, Hitler’s defeat altered the Mufti’s strategy, leading him to focus on inciting terrorism against Jews. Subsequently, Yasser Arafat assumed the leadership of Palestinian terrorism, continuing a legacy of violence, hijackings, attacks, and even the tragic Munich Olympics massacre in 1972.

    Arafat’s approach to the conflict echoed the Mufti’s, and the global community was deeply alarmed by the indiscriminate violence perpetrated by Palestinian terrorist groups. Nevertheless, these historical underpinnings are overlooked or forgotten, and Israel consistently finds itself subject to international criticism for its self-defense measures.

    The question arises: How can negotiations take place when dealing with individuals or groups who seem unwavering in their determination to eliminate Israel?

    The Oslo Accords negotiation revealed Arafat’s lack of genuine peace intentions, as his goal was Palestinian autonomy to intensify terrorism against Israeli Jews. Peace talks eventually collapsed as Arafat rejected generous offers from Israel.

    Today, Palestinian leaders continue to embrace the Mufti’s legacy of absolute rejectionism and no compromise. His genocidal stance towards Jews and emphasis on radical Islamic ideology continue to influence groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and even non-Arab entities like Iran.

    For peace to materialize, it is imperative for Palestinians to decisively renounce the Mufti’s toxic legacy. Unfortunately, this transformation seems improbable unless sincere and pragmatic Palestinian leadership emerges, genuinely committed to the ideals of peace and coexistence.

    Ultimately, this conflict transcends land disputes; it is rooted in carrying out the Mufti’s dream of exterminating all Jews, a chilling echo of the Holocaust.

    Recent events have tragically showcased this desire for genocide live on TV, as countless innocent lives have been lost. Yet, at the same time, the Jew-haters blame the Jews for these atrocities committed against us.

  • Closing Chapters and New Beginnings: Farewell to My Holocaust Blog

    Dear Readers,

    With mixed emotions, I announce the conclusion of our shared journey through the history of the Holocaust. I have accomplished as much as I can, and it is time to move on to other interests.

    Over the past two years, we have ventured into the darkest annals of human history, commemorated the victims, celebrated the survivors, and gleaned invaluable lessons that remain profoundly relevant in today’s world, lessons that must be etched into our collective memory.

    When I embarked on this blog as a follow-up to my book, my aim was to illuminate one of the most harrowing events in human history—an event that should forever serve as a stark reminder of the dire consequences of hatred, prejudice, and discrimination. Through it all, my goal has been to pay tribute to their memory and ensure their experiences are never forgotten.

    I must also say I am genuinely disappointed by the difficulties I’ve faced within the Rochester, NY, Jewish community. It is disheartening to witness personal conflicts and unfounded gossip being wielded to obstruct participation in vital endeavors like Holocaust awareness and education. It is especially troubling when some leaders within the Jewish community prioritize grudges and concealed motives over the inclusion of fellow Jews with direct connections to the Holocaust in these programs. This not only diminishes the memory and respect for those who endured and survived the Holocaust but also contradicts the very values and wishes they held dear.

    Yet, in the midst of this disappointment, I find comfort in the profound impact of our engagement, support, and discussions on this platform. Your comments, emails, and messages have not only enriched the content but have also served as a touching reminder that the memory of the Holocaust endures in the hearts and minds of many.

    As I draw the curtains on this blog, I want to express my deepest gratitude to all of you who have been part of this journey. Your readership, questions, and shared stories have transformed this blog into a meaningful and fulfilling endeavor. While this chapter is concluding, I hope the knowledge and awareness we have cultivated together will continue to inspire tolerance, compassion, and empathy in our world.

  • Navigating the American Culture Wars: Understanding the Divide

    Blog 23-14, written by Jerry Elman, September 21, 2023

    America’s culture wars are a multifaceted, enduring phenomenon deeply ingrained in the nation’s history and values. While these conflicts have caused significant social and cultural changes, they have also exacerbated political polarization and hindered progress on critical societal issues.

    To understand the roots of America’s culture wars, we must embark on a journey back to the mid-20th century, a period marked by seismic social and political transformations. The Civil Rights Movement, Women’s Liberation, the sexual revolution, and the counterculture of the 1960s collectively challenged the prevailing norms and values of the time.

    This tidal wave of change elicited a conservative backlash – a reactionary movement that sought to halt what was seen as a hemorrhaging of traditional values, particularly among religious communities. It was a time when America’s moral compass seemed to be spinning wildly, and the culture wars were born as a response to this perceived crisis of values.

    The culture wars, over time, have become deeply woven into the nation’s political fabric. Political parties have adeptly weaponized cultural issues as a means to mobilize their base and garner electoral support. Contentious issues like abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, gun control, immigration, and religious freedom have morphed into fierce political battlegrounds, often compelling parties to adopt extreme and polarized positions. The resulting polarization has deepened the chasm within American politics, making compromise a rare commodity and further entrenching divisions.

    In the digital age, the media and technology revolution has exponentially amplified the culture wars. The advent of 24-hour cable news, the internet, and the saturation of social media have made it alarmingly easy for individuals to access information that reinforces their preexisting beliefs. Much of the media today focuses on reporting what their base wants to hear, rather than real news and truth. These platforms have given rise to echo chambers, where individuals are cocooned in a reinforcing feedback loop of their own viewpoints. This, in turn, intensifies polarization and fosters an environment where opposing perspectives are often vilified rather than engaged in constructive dialogue.

    As the culture wars have evolved, they have increasingly intersected with the themes of identity and intersectionality. Debates about race, gender, and sexuality have surged to the forefront of the broader cultural and political discourse. Movements like Black Lives Matter, #MeToo, and debates over transgender rights have heightened the complexity of the culture wars, spotlighting the intricate interplay of identity, privilege, and power.

    The Supreme Court of the United States has often been a battleground for culture wars, as its decisions can profoundly impact the social and cultural landscape of the nation. Culture wars in the context of the Supreme Court typically involve the most contentious legal issues that reflect deeper societal divisions and differing interpretations of the Constitution.

    The Cultural Divide

    These specific issues underscore the complexity and diversity of perspectives in American society today.

    White Nationalism: is an age old political and social ideology that advocates for the preservation and advancement of white identity and interests. It often involves the belief in the superiority of white culture and the desire to establish or maintain a predominantly white nation. White nationalism is a highly controversial and divisive ideology, and it has been a significant factor in America’s culture wars going back to slavery and the Civil War.

    Within the context of America’s culture wars, white nationalism crosses over many culture war boundaries including issues related to race, religion, immigration, diversity, and national identity. Some individuals and groups who espouse white nationalist beliefs have engaged in hate speech, discrimination, and acts of violence against minority communities, particularly targeting racial, ethnic, and religious minorities.

    Jews are the number one religious group targeted by white nationalists in America today. Holocaust denial and historic antisemitic tropes thrive with white nationalists. White nationalist hate crimes against Jews are at record levels today.

    Identity Politics: The rise of identity politics has led to debates about the influence of identity, privilege, and intersectionality in society. These discussions explore issues related to race, religion, gender, sexuality, disability, foreign policy and other aspects of identity and how they shape individual experiences and social dynamics.

    Jews have become a flashpoint within identity politics. Extreme progressives label Jews as “privileged,” and as “oppressors” using historic stereotypes and tropes the justify this. The Israel-Palestinian conflict has become a flash point. Many extreme progressives mask their hate of American Jews with criticizing and delegitimizing Israel. They advocate boycotting and even abolishing the Jewish state and much of their argument for doing so is focused on denial of the history of Jews in ancient Israel along with Holocaust denial. If Jews have no history in this land and there never was a Holocaust, then Jews took this land through colonial imperialism is their argument. Reading through all this rhetoric, the real message is that they hate Jews and will find or make up any culture war issue to justify that.

    College campuses have become hot spots for extreme progressive hate of Jews where Jewish students are banned from school activities, clubs, student government and more. Many Jewish students are harassed and even experience physical attacks on college campuses today.

    Hate of Jews has become the single culture war issue both white nationalists and extreme progressives agree on.

    Abortion: The abortion debate encompasses a spectrum of positions, from those who advocate for unrestricted access to abortion as a matter of women’s reproductive rights to those who view abortion as morally wrong and seek to limit or ban it entirely. This issue raises profound questions about when life begins, bodily autonomy, and the role of government in regulating personal decisions.

    LGBTQ+ Rights: Discussions around LGBTQ+ rights involve topics such as marriage equality, transgender rights, and protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Advocates argue for equal treatment and recognition under the law, while opponents may cite religious beliefs or concerns about societal norms.

    Gun Control: The gun control debate revolves around whether and how to regulate firearms. Advocates for stricter gun control measures emphasize public safety, while opponents often invoke the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms and argue for individual self-defense rights.

    Immigration: Immigration policy debates encompass issues like border security, pathways to citizenship, and the treatment of undocumented immigrants. These discussions intersect with questions of national identity, economic impact, and humanitarian considerations, often sparking heated disagreements about immigration’s role in shaping the nation.

    Religious Freedom: Conflicts over religious freedom involve cases where religious beliefs and practices come into tension with anti-discrimination laws or public policy. These cases raise questions about the extent to which religious beliefs should be accommodated in a diverse and secular society.

    Racial Justice: Racial justice issues include systemic racism, police reform, and addressing disparities in areas like education and criminal justice. Movements like Black Lives Matter have brought these concerns to the forefront, sparking discussions about historical injustices and the need for change.

    Climate Change: The climate change debate involves questions about the extent of human influence on the environment, the role of government in regulating industries, and the urgency of addressing climate-related issues such as rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and environmental degradation.

    Education: Cultural conflicts in education drive intense debate over what should be taught in schools, how it should be taught, and the broader role of education in shaping students’ values, beliefs, and worldviews. These conflicts often reflect broader societal disagreements and can encompass various aspects of the educational system, including curriculum content, approved books, classroom practices, and educational policies.

    Healthcare: Healthcare debates touch on issues like access to healthcare, affordability, and the role of government in providing or regulating healthcare services. Contentious topics include the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and debates over public versus private healthcare systems.

    Public Health vs. Individual Liberties: The core of the COVID-19 culture war often revolves around the tension between public health measures and individual freedoms. Mask mandates, lockdowns, and vaccine mandates have been sources of contention. Supporters argue that these measures are necessary to curb the spread of the virus and protect public health, while opponents view them as infringements on personal liberties.

    Free Speech: Discussions about free speech often revolve around defining the boundaries of acceptable expression, especially in the context of hate speech, political correctness, and online content moderation. Balancing the protection of speech with the prevention of harm remains a challenge.

    Affirmative Action: This complex and contentious issue has been at the center of the culture wars for decades and remains a deeply divisive issue in American society, reflecting broader debates about equity, discrimination, and the role of government in addressing historical injustices. The ongoing culture war surrounding affirmative action underscores the complexities of achieving a fair and just society while respecting individual rights and opportunities.

    Economic Inequality: Debates about economic inequality involve discussions about wealth distribution, taxation, and social safety nets. They often touch on the tension between individual economic liberty and calls for greater economic justice, including measures to reduce income disparities.

    Foreign Policy: Foreign policy decisions are a perennial source of cultural conflict, especially when they intersect with deeply held beliefs about America’s role in the world and its responsibility towards global issues. Isolationism and “America First” beliefs conflict with America’s longstanding leadership role in the global community.

    Conclusion

    The consequences of America’s culture wars reverberate throughout our society and political institutions. The extremes of the right and left dominate today. The intensity of today’s culture wars has made it exceedingly challenging for Americans to find common ground and cooperate on critical issues. Moreover, the culture wars have translated into tangible policy reversals and changes across various domains, influencing decisions related to abortion, education, healthcare, immigration, and social welfare.

    Politicians and the media fuel the fires of our culture wars for political gain, power, and money. The current divisiveness, demonization, and lack of civil debate are at levels not seen since the Civil War. Both the left and right are moving to their far extremes leaving little room for dialog, compromise, and civility. The future of America remains unpredictable like never before.

  • L’ Shana Tova!

    As we extend our wishes of L’Shana Tova and anticipate the dawn of a fresh year, let us forever hold dear the memory of our ancestors and the immense challenges and atrocities they faced.

    It is through their perseverance and resilience that we can embrace and celebrate the promise of a new year and brighter future.

    Jerry Elman

  • The Many Fronts of American Jewish Hate Today

    Blog 23-13, September 9, 2013

    The late Rabbi Jonathan Sacks explained Jew-hate, antisemitism, as a virus that morphs predictably: Whatever is any society’s worst sin, the Jews are charged with. Throughout Christian history, Jews have been labeled as the killers of Christ. When race “science” – eugenics – was all the rage before the Holocaust, Jews were racial vermin. In capitalist societies, the Jews were hated as communists; in communist societies, we were despised as capitalist exploiters. When having a nation-state was the way people unified their identity and culture, Jews were cursed as rootless squatters. And so today, when globalism and internationalism are key aspects of the world order, Jews are condemned for having their state.

    There was a period after World War II and the Holocaust where Jews benefitted from a higher standing and global moral ground. The reality and guilt of the Holocaust created guilt for what had been done to Jews and made it unacceptable to be an open, overt Jew-hater.

    Time has passed, and the sickness of Jew-hate is becoming an epidemic again. The virus is not only consistent with the historical Christian and right-wing nationalist hate of Jews but has also mutated to include anti-Israelism or Palestinianism, and Jews worldwide are tainted as oppressors. This new Jew hate has pierced our post-Holocaust shield.

    The virus mutation now has Jew hate being pushed into mainstream American culture and politics by both the far right and far left. The Jewish establishment left us pretty defenseless in the face of this new mutant strain and have no idea how to control this growing Jew-hating epidemic.

    While antisemitism in America is nothing new, since World War II, “American Jews have lived securely knowing that civil society and its institutions have been a reliable buffer against discrimination, prejudice, and violence. Growing threats and violent attacks on Jews and Jewish institutions in recent years have shattered that feeling of safety and security among American Jews.

    Today, Jews account for two percent of the US population, and Jews are the victims of more than half of all hate crimes. One in four Jews say they have experienced antisemitism in the past year. Wearing a yarmulke in public is becoming an increasingly risky endeavor and an open invitation for ridicule or assault. Synagogues today in America look more like armed garrisons than open and welcoming places of worship.

    This is the new reality for American Jews.

    This new assault – ideological and increasingly physical – comes simultaneously from the following ideological camps.

    White Nationalism is based on the historic Jew-hate we’re familiar with. The various ideologies connected to it have been on the rise in recent years, and the antisemitic elements within this movement draw from a long history of Jew-hate, conspiratorial thinking, and scapegoating.

    Today, they update their classic picture of the Jew as conniving, greedy, and powerful behind the scenes, with the charges that we are the ones who invented multiculturalism and are the ones behind the rising tide of non-white immigration that they believe will replace white America. This ideology often involves a combination of racial supremacy, xenophobia, and nativism. They also oppose policies promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, viewing such policies as threats to white domination of America. White nationalists believe in and promote the Great Replacement Theory, which they believe is a deliberate conspiracy to replace white Christian Americans through non-white immigration and intermarriage. The chant “Jews will not replace us” is common among extreme white nationalists as part of their rallies and attacks on Jews.

    Extreme Evangelical Nationalism, which I covered in detail in my last blog, is the most dangerous merger of beliefs in recent times. For the first time, extreme Evangelicals have merged multiple religious-driven beliefs with the above white nationalist beliefs. The extreme religious aspects of their beliefs are as follows:

    1. Christian Nationalism: The belief that America is—and should remain—a fundamentally Christian nation. Such views can blur the lines between religious faith and political allegiance and often marginalize non-Christian or non-white populations. This conflation can be seen in the belief that one must adhere to a strict definition of Christianity to be a “true” American.
    2. End-Times Theology: Certain Evangelical interpretations of biblical prophecy, particularly those derived from dispensational premillennialism, hold that the establishment of the State of Israel is a prerequisite for the Second Coming of Christ. This belief is rooted in a literal reading of Bible prophecies. It suggests that the return of the Jewish people to their ancient homeland will culminate in the Battle of Armageddon, followed by Christ’s millennial reign.
    3. Zionism for Theological, not Pro-Jewish Reasons: Some Evangelicals ardently support the State of Israel because of these theological beliefs rather than out of genuine love or concern for the Jewish people. In fact, their eschatological (death, judgment, heaven, and hell) views suggest that Jews must ultimately convert to Christianity to be saved.
    4. The New Crusade: The idea of a Christian “reclaiming” of historically significant regions resonates with medieval themes. In this context, the Crusade isn’t just about land but is also a cultural and religious assertion of dominance. “The Holy Land,” which they refer to instead of Israel, will be reclaimed and controlled by Christians as another Crusade. Jews and Muslims will be forced to convert.

    Radical Muslims and Antisemitism: Radical Islamists often justify violence against Jews by invoking religious texts or pointing to the Israel-Palestine conflict. This ideology has been responsible for numerous attacks against Jewish targets in Israel, Europe, and occasionally in the U.S.

    1. Religious Extremism: While traditional Islamic teachings recognize Jews as “People of the Book” and emphasize coexistence, extremist interpretations can promote hatred. Such views can be based on selective readings of religious texts or historical grievances.
    2. Israel-Palestinian Conflict: The conflict can stoke antisemitic sentiments, with some unable to distinguish between Jews as a religious/ethnic group and the actions of the Israeli government.
    3. Muslim Diaspora (population dispersed from their native regions) Communities: Muslims from countries with deeply entrenched antisemitic views bring these prejudices with them, affecting their attitudes in their new homes.

    Both Jews and Muslims are targets of white nationalist hatred. Historically, when communities face prejudice, they collaborate to achieve significant strides in mutual understanding and social change. However, deeply ingrained biases prevent this collaboration.

    Black Antisemitism: Black antisemitism refers to prejudicial views, beliefs, or actions against Jewish people that originate within Black communities. It’s important to understand that this topic is multi-faceted, with historical, socio-economic, and political complexities.

    1. Historical Tensions: Throughout history, there have been occasional tensions between Black and Jewish communities. For example, in the United States, while many Jewish Americans were involved in the Civil Rights Movement and worked alongside Black Americans to fight for equality, there were also instances where Jewish and Black community interests diverged, leading to friction.
    2. Socio-economic Factors: In the 20th-century urban U.S., both Jewish and Black communities often lived in close proximity, sometimes competing for the same resources, jobs, or housing. This competition occasionally intensified communal tensions.
    3. Nation of Islam and Farrakhan: Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam, has made numerous antisemitic statements, including perpetuating the false claim that Jews were the principal agents and profiteers of the transatlantic slave trade. This myth, while debunked by historians, has been used to drive a wedge between Black and Jewish communities.
    4. Cultural Production: There have been instances where Black artists in music, literature, or other media have incorporated antisemitic tropes or stereotypes in their work. These instances perpetuate these harmful stereotypes within the Black community.
    5. Divergent Interests and Stereotypes: Just as with any large and diverse groups of people, misunderstandings and stereotypes can develop. Some Black individuals may see Jewish people as representing a white, privileged class, whereas some Jewish individuals might harbor stereotypes about Black people. This can further deepen mistrust and prejudice.
    6. Misunderstanding and Education: Lack of education about Jewish history, the Holocaust, and the diasporic nature of Jewish communities can sometimes lead to generalizations or misconceptions.
    7. Palestinian Solidarity: Some Black activists see a parallel between Palestinians’ struggle and the Black fight against racism and oppression in the U.S. This sometimes leads to a conflation of political disagreements about Israel with broader attitudes toward Jews.

    Extreme Progressive Antisemitism: This is a complex situation given that the relationship between Jewish communities and progressive movements in the United States is both historic and multifaceted.

    1. Historical Involvement: Jews have been involved in progressive movements for over a century, particularly in the U.S. This involvement can be traced back to the waves of Jewish immigrants in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Many were involved in labor movements, civil rights campaigns, and other social justice causes.
    2. Shared Values: Jewish teachings, such as “tikkun olam” (repairing the world), align with many progressive ideals, including justice, equality, and care for the marginalized. Many Jews draw from these teachings to motivate their involvement in social justice work.
    3. Civil Rights Movement: Jewish Americans were prominently involved in the Civil Rights Movement. Notable figures like Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel marched alongside Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and were outspoken advocates for the rights of African Americans.
    4. Feminism: Jewish women have been pivotal in the feminist movement. Figures like Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan, and Bella Abzug played significant roles in second-wave feminism in the 1960s and ’70s.
    5. LGBTQ+ Rights: Jewish activists, both religious and secular, have been involved in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights. Organizations such as Keshet work within Jewish communities to foster LGBTQ+ inclusion.
    6. Labor Movement: Jewish immigrants, particularly those from Eastern Europe, played a central role in the labor movements of the early 20th century. They were involved in union organizing and workers’ rights campaigns.
    7. Modern-Day Progressive Politics: Many Jews in the U.S. identify with progressive politics and struggle with the conflicts presented in the causes they support and the rise in progressive antisemitism.
    8. Interfaith and Intercommunity Work: Many progressive Jews engage in interfaith and intercommunity dialogue and activism, working alongside marginalized groups to advocate for broader social justice causes.

    The past four decades have also seen the growth of extreme progressive groups who are dismissive of antisemitism or often perpetuate it, especially when criticizing Israel. They equate Jews universally with the actions of the Israeli government, invoking conspiracy theories or utilizing old antisemitic tropes.

    1. Antisemitism on College Campuses: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in antisemitic incidents on various college campuses.. These incidents range from defacing Jewish property to exclusionary tactics against Jewish students in campus politics and clubs. Physical attacks on Jewish students are becoming more frequent.
    2. Israel and BDS: Extreme progressive groups have focused on college campuses to serve as prominent platforms for debates about Israel, particularly about the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. While many supporters of BDS emphasize that their criticism is focused on the policies of the Israeli government and not on Jews as a people, there are many instances where the lines have blurred. Jewish students have been targeted or marginalized due to their identity or views on Israel.
    3. Masking Antisemitism through Israeli Policies: There is a significant growth in antisemitic expression through disagreement with Israeli politics and policies. While such disagreement bty itself is legitimate and not antisemitic, the line is crossed when people use this to delegitimize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state. Those who try to delegitimize Israel’s right to exist will also accuse Israel of being a racist apartheid state, many refer to Israel as a Nazi regime, and Holocaust denial is also a common claim. Israel, its leaders, and its citizens are also compared to the historical stereotypes and tropes associated with the hate of Jews.

    More and more, even within the mainstream progressive movement, Jews today find themselves alone again in fending off Jew hate and antisemitism. More and more of the groups and causes they helped and supported for generations are joining the Jew hate bandwagon in today’s times.

    The irony is that while Jews have been heavily involved in social and political justice, they have ignored one group with the world’s longest history of social and political injustice: the Jews!

    American Jews believed that Jews in America were accepted and welcomed in America and did not face social and political injustice themselves to any significant degree. Jewish leaders and Jews never foresaw that this acceptance of Jews was just a post-Holocaust phenomenon that lasted only about four decades.

    The Jewish focus has been on remembering the Holocaust. American Jews believed remembrance of the Holocaust would keep America and the world forever feeling regret and guilt about what had been done to the Jews.

    That was a terrible strategy. History shows that the regret of war and genocide only lasts for about two generations. Then, when those who lived through the atrocities and the next generation are gone, the world returns to its long-term self. Hate and injustice always come back as if they never went away. That’s what viruses do! Pandemics go in cycles.

    Most American Jewish leaders have been taken by surprise and remain asleep at their leadership wheel. They still focus on helping all those facing injustice, except for Jews. They still believe that if Jews stand up for everyone else, everyone else will stand up for us. It’s a great theory. It has never worked in the past. And here we are again! To help anyone else, one must take care of oneself first! This is not being selfish. It’s just a reality.

    Jews again feel betrayed by the people and social issues they stood up for generations. Jews in America feel the most unsafe and scared in generations. Once again, we have learned that no matter what good we do in the world, there will always be those who turn that against us.

    Why does this keep happening? Because the core issue is as Rabbi Jonathan Sacks says, we are fighting a virus. We keep letting the pandemic return rather than take on and defeat the virus once and for all. No one will do that for us. Jews must focus on eliminating Jew-hate as their highest priority tikun alom effort. We could do so much more good for the world if the hate of Jews no longer existed.

  • A Dangerous Merger!

    Blog 23-12, written by Jerry Elman, August 21, 2023

    Throughout history, extreme nationalism has created most wars and massive death. There has never been a good outcome when any nation has embraced extreme nationalism.

    Religion has been the second-most creator of wars and massive death. But religion comes nowhere close to the historical devastation caused by extreme nationalist movements taking power.

    In their Encyclopedia of Wars, Charles Phillips and Alan Axelrod classified only 123 0f the 1763 wars they studied as religious. 

    World War II, the most nationalistic war in human history, killed more people in six years (70-85 million) than all of Europe’s religious wars since the eighth century combined. 

    Nationalism divides the world into “them” and “us,” making no distinction between military and civilian, man and woman, adult and child. Civilians accounted for more than 80 percent of the Allied deaths during World War II, many of them murdered in deliberate genocides perpetrated by Germany and Japan. 

    Extreme forms of nationalism lead to exclusion and division within society. When extreme nationalists emphasize their superiority over others, it creates an “us versus them” mentality that marginalizes or discriminates against minority groups or those perceived as outsiders. This exclusion can lead to social tensions, conflict, violence, war, and genocide. The factors contributing to deadly outcomes of extreme nationalism involve a combination of historical, political, social, and economic factors that interact in complex ways.

    Religious violence involves differences based on interpretations of religious doctrine or practice. Religious fundamentalism is closely associated with this kind of conflict, which exists in all religions. Religious fundamentalism rests on a strict interpretation and intense adherence to a set of principles established by a religious group. The conflict arises when religious fundamentalists see other religious or secular groups as being insufficiently pious. Extremism is the idea that fundamentalist religious goals can be justified by almost any means. Some groups are convinced that they have divine blessing have few limits to their behavior, including resorting to violence. The comment, “killing in the name of god,” is an extreme example of the end justifies the means in religious fundamentalism.

    Today, in the United States, we face the most dangerous situation of all time, the merger of religious fundamentalism and extreme nationalism! Extreme evangelicals have thrown in their lot with the extreme nationalist MAGA movement. For them, “Make America Great Again” also means only the extreme evangelical definition of Christians is welcome in the United States as both a religious and nationalist posture.

    Today’s Evangelical Nationalism intersects evangelical Christian beliefs and nationalist ideology. It is a complex and sometimes controversial phenomenon that involves blending religious convictions with a strong sense of national identity, often manifesting in political and social contexts. Here are some key points to understand about Evangelical Nationalism:

    1. Religious Beliefs: Evangelical Christianity is a form of Protestantism that emphasizes a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, adherence to biblical teachings, and the importance of spreading the Christian message. Evangelicals often hold conservative theological views and prioritize evangelism and conversion.
    2. Nationalism: Nationalism is a political and social ideology that promotes the interests, culture, and identity of a specific nation or group of people. Nationalists often emphasize a sense of unity, patriotism, and loyalty to their country. Nationalists also define who belongs and who doesn’t.
    3. Overlap and Tensions: Evangelical Nationalism occurs when individuals or groups merge their strong religious convictions with a fervent sense of national identity. This leads to blending religious and political values, where religious beliefs guide political attitudes and actions.
    4. Political Engagement: Evangelical Nationalists engage in political activism to promote policies aligned with their religious and nationalist values. This could involve advocating for specific legislation, endorsing political candidates, or organizing around social issues that they believe align with their faith and vision of the nation.
    5. Cultural and Social Issues: Evangelical nationalists focus on cultural and social issues, such as abortion, same-sex marriage, gender roles, and education. They may see these issues as central to preserving what they perceive as the nation’s moral fabric.
    6. Patriotism and Exceptionalism: Evangelical Nationalists view America as uniquely blessed by God and believe that America has a special role in advancing Christianity or specific moral values important to them.
    7. Critiques and Concerns: Critics of Evangelical Nationalism raise concerns about the potential blurring of the lines between church and state, the exclusion of those who do not share the same religious beliefs, and the risk of using religious rhetoric to justify discriminatory or exclusionary policies.

    Nowhere is the unhealthy alliance of religion and politics more blatantly manifest than in the “ReAwaken Tour” making its way across the country in organized rallies.

    Retired general and Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn launched the movement after the failed Jan. 6 insurrection. At one gathering, Flynn declared, “There is a spiritual war, and there is a political war” going on in the United States. 

    The “ReAwaken” road show holds rallies in cities nationwide, touting a bizarre blend of QAnon conspiracy theories, political rhetoric, and revivalism. Events feature Trump-supporting speakers like Eric Trump, MyPillow founder Mike Lindell, and former Trump advisor Roger Stone, as well as Flynn. Marjorie Taylor Green, Matt Gaetz, Lauren Boebert, Scott Perry, Paul Gosar, Mo Brooks and other Republicans are participants or cheerleaders of the ReAwaken road show.

    Vendors hawk expensive merchandise while others distribute literature featuring “research recommendations,” including “Alex Jones’s InfoWars, a John Birch Society speech and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a notorious, century-old antisemitic hoax.” The Protocols of the Elders of Zion fueled Russian anti-Semitism and pogroms and were the basis of Hitler’s beliefs as written in his book “Mein Kamph.”

    Most recently, Flynn spoke about how Jews were the blame for their genocide during the Holocaust.

    At these rallies, speakers repeat the big lie that Trump won the 2020 election and promote QAnon conspiracy theories. Antisemitism, racism, and many more themes of hate.

    The ReAwaken America Tour touts the Evangelical Nationalist belief that the United States was founded as a white Christian nation and must return to being one, governed according to their ultra conservative religious principles. 

    Many of its adherents go further, embracing “American exceptionalism.” They see the United States as a nation blessed by God, provided it remains true to its fundamentalist Christian identity and provides that example to the rest of the world. 

    Evangelical nationalists advocate for school prayer, state funding for religious education, and abortion bans. Its adherents have been supporting politicians like former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Kandiss Taylor, who summed up her platform as such:  “Jesus, Guns, & Babies.” 

    Like much of far-right extremism, Evengalical nationalism manifests itself pervasively as an ideological movement rather than as an organization, although members of many designated extremist groups espouse its beliefs. 

    Evangelical nationalists figured prominently in the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville. Many could be identified by the “Deus Vult” (“God wills it) symbol displayed on their signs and flags. 

    The red cross on a white background was supposedly introduced by Pope Urban III when he called for the first crusade in 1095. 

    Contrary to what the movement claims, the framers of the Constitution were not evangelical Christians. 

    Drafters of the Bill of Rights created the disestablishment clause of the First Amendment for a good reason. To avoid the intolerance and bloodshed caused by established European churches, they mandated that “Congress shall make no law respecting establishment of religion.” 

    Most Evangelical Nationalists realize they cannot get their view of Christianity declared the national religion, so they pursue an equally dangerous agenda: legislating their narrow version of Evangelical morality at the state and local level and using the courts to support that agenda. 

    They are very focused and have been very successful with this agenda. By combining their religious views with their nationalist views, most red state legislatures today have Republican “supermajorities” that are enacting laws exactly as dictated by the voters who put them in office. Fox News promotes their extreme religious and nationalist agenda non-stop in its 24 hour cycle on the air.

    What makes this movement the most dangerous is that it is much bigger than Donald Trump and the MAGA movement. Even Donald Trump does not control it! He has embraced it for his own power and benefit, which is what has made him so popular and worshiped by the Evangelical Nationalist movement.

    But Donald Trump and the MAGA movement going away will do nothing to stop or slow this movement down. Their real focus is on state-by-state legislation and controlling the agenda in Congress and the Supreme Court. The White House is just a bonus to their cause.

  • The Jew Haters Just Came Out of The Woodwork!

    My last blog, “Dead Jews Are The Norm!” went a bit viral and received a considerable amount of feedback and comments. While some comments supported and agreed with my blog article, most replies spewed Jew hatred and confirmed all the comments I made in “Dead Jews are the Norm.”

    Today, the most significant expression of antisemitism and Jew hatred is to condemn and deny the legitimate existence of Israel. It is one thing to disagree with the government of Israel, which even I disagree with. But the existence of a Jewish state is a whole other thing. People hate Israel for the specific reason it is a Jewish state.

    So the messages came back loud and clear; people prefer dead Jews and will find any reason to support their hate of Jews! I did not expect my blog article to be an actual data collecting experiment in Jew hate, but it turned out as such.

    And as I said in my blog article, many in the world are totally pissed that today Jews have their own country and an army that will successfully defend Jews. They despise the fact Jews will no longer remain defenseless victims of hate. We deny them their expected norm!

    This is a sample of the Jew-hating comments sent as responses to my blog “Dead Jews Are The Norm:”

    Let me let you down easy here. For all the hand wringing and wailing, jews are by no means the most persecuted people on the planet. The fascination with what happened to your tribe, is tribalism. That’s not virtue. You want to keep chiming about your own suffering and ignoring the suffering of others? That’s not virtue. Yes it’s a tragedy, but nobody alive today bears any guilt for this. Stop trying to milk it.

    you jew were never the chosen ones! your sodomites and edomites and your daddy is Satan. you know damn well the holocaust was a hoax and its all about money for your greedy nasty race. I am a white man from Adam, an Israelite. As children of the Heavenly Father, we were born of Spirit. You children of Satan, are born dead, without spirit and cannot inherit the Kingdon of Heaven. No such thing as a christian jew either. You are doomed to hell, that’s why jews do not read the bible it tells the truth about you!

    “the 16 million Jews worldwide are 16 million too many!”

    “LYING CULTIST.”

    Gee whizz – Wonder why people hate you jews?”

    “too bad there were Jewish survivors and more jews like you were born!”

    “never again, what? The lie of a holocaust? Or the assault on our Liberty. One happened, the other did not. Israel killed Americans, and that should never be forgotten!!!”

    This Palestinian baby was burned alive by Jewish settlers. These settlers then taunted the family of this baby by shouting “Ali’s on the grill.” Holocaust my ass!

    Hitler didn’t start out murdering Jews. Israel didn’t start out a Zionazi Genocide Machine. Six Million murdered Jews does not give Netanyahu the right to Lebensraum. Israel is a European Imperialistic Power. Apparently, all the REAL Jews were exterminated in the Holocaust! I’m sure they would be appalled to see what is being done in their name today!

    “Hopefully, they’ll (Jews) be more landmarks in the future!”

    “Not nearly so ‘norm’ as dead Palestinian children…”

    Jews are so accustomed to thinking of themselves as victims, and it is especially difficult for them to admit they have victimized others.

    “it looks as if most of those 16 million Jews are demonstrating against their own Apartheid and criminal government. It’s not the Arabs who want to wipe Israel off the map. The Israel government is doing a better job. This is happening today.”

    So you support the corrupt Biden family who wants to take away everyone’s freedom and you think they will protect the Jews? You are dreaming. True Christians know that the Jews are God’s chosen people and if the U.S. doesn’t support Israel it will not bode well for them. Biden is a fake Catholic and does not follow any Christian principles. If it weren’t for us real Christians you would not be allowed in America and there would be no country of Israel.

    “it seems Jews should be hated, and as I watch what unfolds in Palestine, I can understand why.

    “I am older than Israel, I mean Palestine. Now go away; your mutterings are of no value.”

    Keep telling those lies, but more and more people are waking up to the truth, and there was never a holocaust. Oh, and about the jews, and how I feel about them, you are right on that one.

    What about the DEAD Palestinians that Israel is targeting every day???!?

    Today, dead Palestinians are the norm! Israel targets CIVILIANs in Gaza

    We saw what happened to Palestine when they took in jew refugees

    Zionism is part of a worldwide fascist resurgence. They feed off of each other.

    Liberals hate people that stand up for themselves. To a liberal, the ideal person is a North Korean. Totally dependent on minions.

    “Israel is an illegal occupying entity with a powerful army, the Palestinians will be arrested if they have a knife in their possession. There is no Palestinian army, only innocent civilians!”

    “i never forget the genocide of Palestinians.. thats what i Never Forget..”

    You don’t really believe in equal rights, you think we’re worth more than other people… You support the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians… You’re just like the people who persecuted us!” (this comment was from a Jew)

    “learn some history. of the 11 million people killed IN THE HOLOCAUST, only about 60% were Jewish. Various minorities were targeted and butchered, all in horrible ways, all targeted for who they were. That’s ON TOP OF the 20-40 MILLION Soviets ALONE who died ending the Holocaust, people for whom for some reason you have contempt. Stop with the “my deaths were more important than your deaths.”

    Actually, Jews were a MINORITY of victims of the Holocaust.

    how many russians died in WW2,, take a guess. yet we continue to harp on the so called 6 million,,why,, because its good for business thats why,,what business you ask,,the Israel business.,,as long as we continue to throw 6 million at the common people,,those same people will support israel and to me thats a tragedy..

    Why the focus on Jewish dead? There were a lot more Catholics, Protestants and Russian Orthodox Christians killed in the Twentieth Century than Jews. Also, more than a few of the killers were Jews.

    “more the better! you turds perpetrated one of the biggest hoax’s ever ww11 holocaust.”

    There is a powerful message in pulling these comments together as a blog article. Go through the comments again and think about them! What is the message? What is the ignorance or propaganda that drives these comments? What drives the hate behind these comments? How do we stop this without becoming haters ourselves? Silence is not the answer! So what is the answer?

    In reading the comments, my first reaction was to get angry, but as more comments came in, I realized the comments represented precisely what would be expected in response to my blog article. These comments confirm the hypothesis that dead Jews are an accepted norm. So I began to look at this as part of my own experimentation and education.

    I have my own thoughts on how we, as Jews, face this continuing world of antisemitism or, as I call it, Jew hate. I have ideas, building on what I learned from my parents and other Holocaust survivors and their stories of the hate they faced.

    The answer is directly addressing antisemitism, and Jew hate head-on. Every Jewish Federation should have a formal effort to face and address antisemitism within their communities. The learnings of the Holocaust and the testimony of survivors can be built into this. There should be an “Antisemitism Work Group or Committee” in every Jewish Federation.

    The best way we can “Never Forget” or honor the memory of the 6 million that perished and those that survived is to focus our efforts on ending antisemitism. Before, during, and after the Holocaust, the Jews of Eastern Europe, my parents included, yearned for a world where Jews were not hated. Jews will never be safe and secure until we focus and succeed in reducing and then eliminating the hate of Jews. That will never happen without focused efforts in each and every local community.

  • Dead Jews Are The Norm!

    Blog 23-10, Written by Jerry Elman – July 6, 2023

    If you visit Eastern Europe as Janet and I did in 2022, you cannot avoid all the formal and informal landmarks where Jews were rounded up and killed. Every city, every village, has obvious and hidden places all over the landscape where Jews were the victims of the Nazis and the local hatred of Jews. Poland stands out to some historians as a country that killed more Jews than Nazis in WW II. No one knows the real numbers to confirm or dispute that. But we do know 3 million Jews were killed in Poland. Probably not that many Germans!

    Wherever you go in Eastern Europe, once home to over 9 million Jews, the tour guides point out the landmarks and history. Over there, dead Jews! Over there, more dead Jews! They used to live there! There is where the ghetto was. There was the old synagogue. They were rounded up here and taken there! They were shot and buried there! There is the concentration camp where they worked as slaves and died! There is the death camp where they were gassed and incinerated! There are the rivers and fields where their ashes and bones were dumped! There is where another pogrom took place after the war!

    Jews today? No, they hardly exist here! And no one misses them! In these countries, they only know about dead Jews because very few living Jews exist today.

    In the entire world today, only 16 million Jews in total exist. Six million in the United States. About 7 million in Israel. The other 3 million are scattered around the world. Yet many, perhaps, a majority of people in the world today still believe the old myths that Jews control everything and are up to no good, even in countries where almost no Jews exist. Facts don’t matter. Numbers don’t matter. Hate matters! And someone has to be the scapegoat for all that is wrong in a country, in the world. It has to be all those dead Jews and the current 16 million living Jews.

    The almost 8 Billion people in the world today seem to have the age-old imagined problem of being controlled by the 0.2% percent of people who are living Jews! In the Arab world, there are 457 million people. Within these same Arab countries today, there are only 12,700 Jews. That is 0.003% of the Arab population! Arabs control 5 million square miles of land. Israel consists of 8,550 square miles of land. That is 0.17% of disputed land. The 12,700 Jews who live in Arab countries are under constant persecution. And the 7 million Jews who live in this 0.17% of disputed land have been under attack and war since before Israel’s founding in 1948.

    After WW II ended, most Jews in Poland and Eastern Europe had no place to go. Those that returned to Poland were attacked in pogroms and killed in large numbers. The same happened in other countries. At the same time, the United States, Britain, and other countries refused to admit Jewish refugees who survived the Holocaust. Britain also froze Jewish immigration to Mandatory Palestine under their control. Over 600,000 stateless Jewish Refugees (200,000 who fled Poland) were stuck in displaced persons (DP) camps with nowhere to go.

    The State of Israel was founded on May 14, 1948, and immediately opened the door to accept the 600,000 stateless Jewish refugees. Many of these Holocaust survivors had to fight in Israel’s war of independence. Many died in that war. Israel was attacked by all surrounding Arab countries with the intent to destroy the new Jewish State. Had Israel lost this war, most Jews in Israel would have been killed by the Arabs who declared they would destroy the Jews and drive them into the sea!

    Until the conclusion of the 6-day war in June 1967, the common goal of the Arab world continued to be the annihilation of the Jews in Israel with the odds in their favor. The world did not care back then and watched three unprovoked wars happen, expecting the Jews would be annihilated. The world was shocked that Israel defeated the Arabs each time.

    That Arab goal continues today! Does the world care? Not really. The world is angry that for the first time since Roman days, the Jews can now defend themselves and no longer be killed in large numbers at whim! The world does not care that if the Arabs ever succeed, visiting Israel will be like visiting Eastern Europe today. Dead Jews there! Dead Jews there! Dead Jews here! No living Jews to see or talk about anymore! The Arabs and “Palestinians” (a term created by the British) have rejected offer after offer for peace. They choose the annihilation of the Jews instead. And yes, world, the Jews will fight and defend themselves. We know that makes many people angry. Jews are supposed to be victims and killed. How dare we stand up and defend ourselves! How dare we defeat those that seek to destroy us! For Jews, this is the real meaning of the term “never again!” We will never again be defenseless; we will never again be stateless with no place to go!

    My words may seem too blunt and harsh! But what I am trying to get across, especially to non-Jews, is how a tiny world population of 16 million Jews view the world around them today! How Jews have viewed the world around them since Roman times, over 2,000 years! Why do people believe the same baseless conspiracy theories about Jews generation after generation? Why is it the accepted norm for Jews to be killed?

    Even Jews today have become complacent and uncaring about the significant increase in the hate of Jews in the United States, Europe, and the rest of the world. Hate of Jews is rising at rates not seen since the rise of Hitler in the 1930s.

    Israelis feel the threat since they face war and terrorism every day. Many American and European Jews do not even care about Israel’s existence today! It interferes with assimilation and not being known as a Jew. So many Jews today believe losing their Jewish identity and “fitting in” unnoticed as other “white” people is the way to survive and be safe. Just what the Jews of Germany in the 1930s thought! We will never be safe unless we stand up for and defend ourselves. That we let the world know we are Jews and will not allow history to repeat itself again! We will never allow ourselves to be innocent victims to be pointed out as more dead Jews again!

    It’s quite easy for the world to commemorate dead Jews, especially on Holocaust Remembrance Day! It’s even easier to condemn the Nazis as evil. But what exactly is the point of such an exercise if Jews and non-Jews are unwilling to stand up for living Jews today?

    For the generations immediately following 1945, the sheer enormity and horror of the Holocaust was enough to put hate of Jews (antisemitism) — or at least, public expressions of it — out of fashion and unacceptable. After all, hating Jews was something the Nazis did. And who wants to be known or outed as a Nazi? But as the memory and knowledge of the Holocaust fade, along with those who witnessed it, hate of Jews (antisemitism) is again rearing its ugly head globally. The MAGA movement has made it ok to come out again as public Jew haters in the United States. Nationalism worldwide has opened the same door worldwide.

    And Radical liberals have also embraced hate of Jews under the false pretenses of being anti-Israel, not antisemites! Jewish students on college campuses across the United States are being harassed and attacked. They are being banned from campus activities. And they live in fear every day! Again, looking at it from a Jewish perspective, these are our children and grandchildren at risk of Jewish hate harm, like our parents and grandparents faced in the 1930s!

    Meanwhile, the European Jewish communities that still exist are once again wondering if they have a future on the continent. There are few places where this is as pronounced as France, whose Jews have faced unrelenting and often deadly attacks in recent years, prompting many to leave. As National Geographic noted in 2019, “A third of all the French Jews who’ve emigrated to Israel since its establishment in 1948 have done so in the last ten years.”

    Across the English Channel, a few years ago, Britain nearly opened up 10 Downing Street to a radical left-wing zealot so intractably antisemitic that 47 percent of British Jews said they would seriously consider emigrating should he become prime minister. Fortunately, he lost, but antisemitism remains strong in Britain. Its National Union of Students (NUS) (like colleges in the US) has created such a toxic anti-Jewish atmosphere over the years that in 2022 the UK government suspended all ties and funding to the NUS until the antisemitism allegations are “suitably addressed.”)

    In her critically acclaimed book People Love Dead Jews, Dara Horn observed:

    “Hating Jews was normal. And historically speaking, the decades [after the Holocaust] … simply hadn’t been normal. Now, normal was coming back.”

    And it’s back with a vengeance: despite comprising just 2 percent of the US population, Jews were victims of more than half of all religiously motivated hate crimes in the United States in 2020, according to the FBI. But that shouldn’t surprise students of Jewish history in America. After all, a 1938 Gallup survey found that 54 percent of Americans believed that “the persecution of Jews in Europe has been ‘partly” their own fault, while 11 percent believed it was “entirely” their fault.

    Many people over the years have tried to mask the Holocaust’s Jewish focus by changing the focus to the non-Jewish victims, such as the Roma. Few have responded to this as well as Dara Horn:

    “We … know that other groups have been persecuted too, and this degrading need to recite these middle-school-obvious facts is itself an illustration of the problem, which is that dead Jews are only worth discussing if they are part of something bigger, something more.”

    And people can rarely resist placing Jewish suffering in the context of something bigger. Just ask Whoopi Goldberg, who suggested on The View last year that the Holocaust was “not about race” but rather “man’s inhumanity to man.” Or ask Jews how many times they’ve heard that we are “canaries in the coal mine” — in other words, the idea that society should care about attacks on Jews because it acts as a forewarning that real people — people who actually matter — could be next.

    But Jewish suffering is not just universalized. The uniquely Jewish experience of suffering and killing is often erased. The Nazis murdered two out of every three European Jews. Poland alone was home to 3.3 million Jews in 1939. By the end of the war, only 380,000 were left. An entire civilization was destroyed in six years. But this reality is erased by making the Jewish annihilation a subset of WW II. A hidden footnote.

    This occurs worldwide when the Holocaust is discussed, even when memorials are dedicated. The discussions and dedications now fail to mention that the Holocaust happened to Jews. WW II was a war over territory. The Holocaust was the Nazi state-focused annihilation of Jews. They are not one and the same. One example of this was Canada’s National Holocaust Monument at its 2017 unveiling, after which it was pointed out that its memorial plaque did not mention Jews or antisemitism. Unfortunately, this is part of a growing common habit of erasing the Holocaust — sometimes innocent, sometimes not — of erasing Jews and hatred of Jews from our most traumatic historical experience.

    Condemning the plastering of swastikas in a heavily Jewish suburb is easy. It gets all kinds of media attention and press statements of condemnation. But hatred of Jews doesn’t always come with a swastika attached. And here’s where it gets tricky. The Atlantic’s Yair Rosenberg explains:

    “Because most people associate anti-Jewish prejudice with systematic genocide, they tend not to recognize anti-Semitism when it manifests in its more common but less extreme expressions. When you set the bar for bigotry at mass murder, most of the other expressions don’t make the cut.”

    Anti-Israel conspiracy theories don’t make the cut. University student unions passing Jew-hating (antisemitic) motions openly don’t make the cut. Running political campaigns rife with overt anti-Jewish tropes doesn’t qualify either. Attacks on Jewish synagogues and institutions don’t make the cut until killings are involved. Then we are dealing with dead Jews, the norm that makes the cut.

    The accepted norms of Jew hate keep increasing today. Jews are being threatened, harassed, and attacked. Jewish students in public schools and colleges live in fear daily because they are targeted for hate only because they are Jews.

    Many Jews are reacting by trying to hide the fact they are Jews. No more wearing Star of David necklaces or talking about Jewish holidays. Jews won’t even stand up for being Jews out of fear. I am shocked at how many Jewish organizations (I cannot call them “leaders”) “administrators/managers” are hiding and “laying low” instead of being real leaders and taking charge to lead a coordinated Jewish response to all this.

    It shocks me and saddens me that even my own local Jewish community in Rochester, NY has little interest today in the Holocaust or in taking any meaningful public action to deal with the growing acting out of hatred of Jews. The most that gets done is issuing press statements when Jew-hating flyers are left in some Jewish neighborhoods.

    But the name of the Jew-hating organization (Goyim Defense League) is not included because that is viewed as giving them recognition. Shouldn’t people know who is threatening them?

    No offensive plan exists. Only silence and a bunker mentality are the focus. $10 million is being raised and spent on the security of Jewish organization buildings. But that does nothing to directly take on the Jew-haters. That does nothing to gain overall community support for Jews. It only makes people who work in these buildings doing “Jewish Jobs” think they will be safe at work. I guess they fend for themselves when they go out for lunch or drive home! My father was a partisan fighter during the Holocaust. They did not build bomb-proof bunkers in the ground where they slept. They focused on offensive actions like attacking Germans and blowing up trains with the limited resources they had. They protected others, not themselves!

    We are now in the year 2023. Go back to 1933 (90 years), and things are starting to look the same. As the acceptable norms keep moving to allow more and more acceptance of hateful behaviors and acts, violence becomes acceptable, and then killing. And then, someday, a tour guide will again point out where all the dead Jews are!

    More Jews, led by our formal Jewish organizations, need to develop action plans to reach out to both the Jewish and non-Jewish communities to create a dialog and build relationships before things get totally out of control. Jews must take ownership of their own fate through organized deliberate efforts to stop the hate. We must focus on educating non-Jews on the Jewish feelings and perspective on events in the world today. And non-Jews need to hear us out and try to understand what it’s like living in a world where the memory of dead Jews far outnumbers living Jews.

    We are 16 million. We have still never recovered the numbers we lost in the Holocaust. We want to live our lives on this earth no differently than any other human beings.

  • PERPETRATORS, COLLABORATORS AND BYSTANDERS

    Blog 23-9, written by Jerry Elman, June 19, 2023

    “…a civilization is not destroyed by wicked people;
    it is not necessary that people be wicked,
    but only that they be spineless.”
    James Baldwin

    Hitler could not have accomplished the depth and massive nature of the Holocaust without the Perpetrators, Collaborators, and Bystanders who collectively gave him the support and mandate to exterminate the Jews. Very little is written about these three groups from the perspective of enablers.

    Hitler and the Nazi regime were the perpetrators directly and indirectly. Germany as a nation was mobilized to both fight the war and kill Jews. Killing Jews had a higher priority than fighting the war.

    At the end of WW II many Germans claimed ignorance of the genocide of Jews. Too many historians and writers accept this ignorance as real. Hitler did everything possible to keep Germans out of the roundup and killing of Jews. The only Germans directly engaged were the SS.

    However, 900,000 Germans were in the SS, and several million were in the regular armed forces, police and government bureaucracies. There were 500,000 clerical and 900,000 manual workers in the railway network, which was key to transporting Jews to the camps. Letters and photographs sent home by German soldiers at the front frequently documented the atrocities. While most of these people outside the SS were not directly involved in the killing, they knew what was happening through their roles in the war effort.

    German officer Helmuth von Moltke wrote to his wife in August 1941 referring to the slaughter of Jews: “What will happen when the nation as a whole realizes this war is lost … with a blood guilt that cannot be atoned for in our lifetime and can never be forgotten.”

    Ordinary Germans were beneficiaries of the persecution and murder. In one six-week period, 222,269 sets of men’s suits and underclothes, 192,652 sets of women’s clothing, and 99,922 sets of children’s clothes, all collected from gassed victims at Auschwitz, were distributed among civilians in Germany. Between 15 and 20 billion Reich Marks were deposited in German banks, representing the proceeds of the theft of the savings, property, and possessions of murdered European Jews.

    The Nazis were aided in their crimes by collaborators from many of the Axis nations, Germany’s allies, and the puppet states they set up in conquered territory. Each state responded differently to the Nazi extermination program, with significant variations in cooperation and, sometimes, active opposition.

    Austrians, including Adolf Hitler and Adolf Eichmann, were prominent in the Nazi leadership and the Einsatzgruppen. (Einsatzgruppen were death squads set up to kill Jews and communist officials. They provided one-third of the personnel of the SS extermination units and commanded four of the six main death camps.

    In Romania, General Ion Antonescu led a coalition government of military officers and the fascist Iron Guard. In a gruesome episode during a three-day civil war in 1940, the Iron Guard hanged dozens of murdered Jews on meat hooks in the slaughterhouse of Bucharest. This government was responsible for the deportation of Jews to camps in Transnistria in Romanian-occupied Ukraine, where approximately 270,000 died due to neglect, starvation, and disease.

    Romanian troops working with Einsatzgruppen D in southern Russia were considered cruel and barbarous even by the Germans because, among other reasons, they often refused to bury the corpses of Jews they had murdered. They just left their dead bodies to rot.

    In Ukraine, Byelorussia, and the Baltic States, traditional Christian antisemitism was exploited by propaganda identifying Jews with Bolshevism and the crimes of Stalin, which had claimed the lives of millions. (In fact, Jews had been among those whom Stalin treated most harshly when he killed millions before WW II). Many Eastern Europeans were receptive to Nazi ideology because of the Russian Empire Jew-hating influence going back to Cathryn the Great. The result was enthusiastic participation in the mass killings by various antisemitic groups.

    The Hungarian government, under Admiral Horthy, sent some 20,000 German-Jewish refugees back to Germany in 1941. The government also conscripted Jews for forced labor; at least 27,000 died. However, the Horthy government refused to permit the deportation of Hungarian Jews to the Nazi death camps.

    In March 1944, Nazi troops occupied Hungary and installed a puppet government that deported almost 440,000 Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz between May and July 1944. Thereafter, the Hungarian fascist and Jew-hating organization, Arrow Cross, was turned loose against the remaining Jewish population, murdering thousands in mass shootings and committing numerous other atrocities.

    Slovakia declared itself an independent state in 1939 under the leadership of a Catholic priest, Jozef Tito, who was responsible for the deportation and deaths of approximately 75,000 Jews from Slovakia and the confiscation of their property. Slovakia agreed to make a payment to Germany of 500 Reichsmark for every Jew deported, provided that Germany would make no claim on the Jewish property confiscated.

    Croatia, governed by the fascist Ustashi organization under Ante Pavelic, had its own concentration camp system, with the largest camp at Jasenovac, where many thousands of political opponents and ethnic minorities were killed, including Serbs, Jews, and Roma. About 20,000 Jews were either murdered by the Ustashi or deported to Auschwitz, of whom about 5,000 survived. In Serbia, 90 percent of the Jewish population of 17,000 were killed in mobile gas vans or by mass shootings.

    In France, there were no fewer than 10 Jew-hating political organizations before the war calling for the destruction of the Jews, and some 77,000 Jews were deported to the extermination camps with the help of the Vichy French authorities. However, most of the French declined to collaborate with the genocide policy, and three-quarters of the French Jews survived, many hidden by Church institutions and Christian families.

    Among the Nazis’ most enthusiastic supporters were Palestinian political leader Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini and his followers. In 1941 al-Husseini fled Palestine (which was under British Mandate rule) and resided in the German capital, Berlin, as Hitler’s special guest. He was relentless in advocating for the extermination of Jews in radio broadcasts to the Middle East and recruiting Balkan Muslims for infamous SS “mountain divisions” that tried to destroy Jewish communities throughout the region.

    He wrote in his memoirs: “Our fundamental condition for co-operating with Nazi Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world.” Al-Husseini also wrote that in July 1943, Himmler informed him that the number of Jews “so far exterminated” in Europe was “about three million”.

    Al-Husseini intervened to stop an attempt by Red Cross officials to negotiate the exchange of 4,000 Jewish children from Poland, resulting in the children being sent instead to Auschwitz. He also wrote to the foreign ministers of Romania and Hungary, requesting them to send their Jewish population “to Poland.”

    SS-Captain Dieter Wisliceny, one of Adolf Eichmann’s henchmen, testified during his trial in Nuremberg that al-Husseini was “one of the initiators of the systematic extermination of European Jewry and had been a collaborator and advisor of Eichmann and Himmler in the execution of this plan….He was one of Eichmann’s best friends and had constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures. I heard him say, accompanied by Eichmann, he had visited incognito the gas chamber of Auschwitz.”

    Today, Palestinian nationalists continue to regard al-Husseini as a hero and martyr with a commitment to continue the war against Jews that al-Husseini started. Al Husseini can be considered the catalyst for the ongoing Israel and Palestinian conflict taking advantage of major British blunders. In the 1970s, Yassar Arafat formed the Palestine Liberation Organization and other terrorist groups picking up the mandate to destroy all Jews in Israel from Al Husseini. Arafat even falsely claimed to be a relative of al Husseini to give himself more legitimacy. In a future blog, I will cover the true origins of the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

    Bystanders made up a majority of the population of Europe during WW II. Bystanders gave Hitler and the Nazi regime the ultimate permission to exterminate Jews by saying nothing and doing nothing. After Kristallnacht in 1938, Hilter tested and saw the silence. He knew he had a green light to proceed.

    It is challenging to pinpoint who the bystanders were because bystanders, by definition, stood by and did nothing. They acted passive and indifferent. They had no direct role as a perpetrator or collaborator. This makes them innocent of any crime! Many were silent supporters of what the Nazis did. Many were silent opposers of what the Nazis did. Many were silent because they were indifferent and did not care. And many were silent because the fear of getting involved drove them.

    Almost nothing is ever documented or written about bystanders. History never talks about them. Historians never write about them. Documenting and writing about people who did nothing and said nothing is boring! Bystanders always cleanly get away with their silence and inaction!

    After the war ended, many leaders and people throughout Europe would claim “they were silently opposed to the killing of Jews.” They tried the take the high road of claiming action through a claim of silent thoughts! They only broke their silence and made such a ridiculous claim after the war ended!

  • The Sonderkommando and Their Important Legacy To Document What Happened!

    Lesław Dyrcz leaned over a pile of rubble and dirt, completely unaware that he was about to make a discovery that would shed light on one of history’s darkest moments. It was 1980, and the forestry student was working to help restore the original forest around what was once Auschwitz-Birkenau, one of the Nazis’ most notorious death camps. Dyrcz was there to help mitigate the effects decades of air pollution had on the forest, attempting to let its original pine trees grow once more. But the student was about to change history.

    As he dug, Dyrcz discovered a leather briefcase buried in the ground. He opened it up and found a thermos. Inside the container were pages of handwritten paper. Though Dyrcz could not read the text—it was written in Greek—he had just discovered one of the most important pieces of testimony of the Holocaust: eyewitness accounts of Nazi crimes, written by Marcel Nadjary, a Jewish man from Greece who had been enslaved with about 2,000 others and forced to help the Nazis as they operated their grimly efficient killing machines.

    Nadjary had been one of the Sonderkommando—a group of men, most of them Jewish, tasked with taking the Nazis’ victims from the gas chambers and disposing of the bodies. At the peak of Auschwitz’s operations, up to 6,000 Jews a day were gassed by the Nazis. Then, the Sonderkommando’s unthinkable task began.

    The men of the Sonderkommando did more than help dispose of the Nazis’ victims: They also provided critical documentation of their captors’ crimes. Though historians had known about the Sonderkommando, the secrecy of their work and the fact that so many didn’t survive the Holocaust, made testimony like Nadjary’s even more precious.

    Even at the height of the Holocaust, the work of the Sonderkommando was shrouded in mystery and performed under the threat of death. Since the people brought to the gas chambers were all murdered, the Sonderkommando were the only witnesses who survived. And since they knew the Nazis’ secrets firsthand, their lives at Auschwitz were marked by fear and isolation.

    The word Sonderkommando means “special unit” in German, and from the start, the men tasked with helping the Nazis lived lives that were different from those of other prisoners at Auschwitz. Young prisoners—all able-bodied men—were selected for the unit when they arrived at camp and were forced to serve without being given a briefing on their tasks. Since the men were required to lift corpses, they were given better rations than other prisoners. They were also kept in isolation; most never interacted with other prisoners at the camp aside from other members of the unit and those who were about to be murdered.

    The duties of Sonderkommando varied, but all entailed helping the Nazis move along their extermination of Jews. Nazis did the actual killing, dropping Zyklon B pellets into gas chambers, but the Sonderkommando were forced to do nearly everything else. They helped maintain order among prisoners who were about to be killed, lying and telling them that they needed to take showers before rejoining their families. They removed the naked bodies from the gas chamber, picked them over for gold teeth and hidden valuables, and cut their hair off to sell to German companies to be used for cloth, ammunition packaging and other purposes. They sorted the clothing and personal effects they had left behind. They carried the bodies to the crematoria and stuffed them into the ovens. Then they ground the remaining bones and took the ashes to various dumping sites to hide the evidence.

    The Sonderkommandos’ work ultimately helped the Nazis, but was performed under constant threat of death and with an understanding that, as material witnesses to the Nazis’ crimes, they too would be murdered at some point. Many were even forced to dispose of the bodies of their own loved ones.

    But the proximity of the Sonderkommando to the Nazis’ crimes also gave them special access to evidence of the mass murder and genocide committed at Auschwitz. In late 1944, as the war seemed close to an end, a group of Sonderkommando revolted in a short-lived mutiny that ended with the explosion of one of the crematoria and the murder of most of the conspirators. Many members of the units felt the urgent need to spread the word about what they had witnessed.

    “Survivors of Auschwitz have repeatedly reported that members of the Sonderkommando called out to them: ‘When you leave the camp, talk, write and scream so the world may learn what is happening here!’” wrote Hermann Langbein, who was imprisoned at Auschwitz in 1942.

    Another attempt to record the history of the killing operation at Auschwitz took place in 1944, when a group of Sonderkommando smuggled a camera onto their job site and photographed a group of naked women awaiting their turn in the gas chambers. They also took an accidental photo of some trees in the forest where the gas chambers were located and two photos of bodies being burned in the open, which had become a necessity due to overcrowded furnaces.

    The four photographs, which were smuggled out of the camp in a toothpaste tube and delivered to Polish Resistance fighters, are the only photos in existence that document what happened near the gas chambers at Auschwitz.

    Those images—and the testimony of people like Nadjary, who recorded details of the gas chambers along with his desire to avenge his mother, father, and sister, all of whom were murdered at Auschwitz—didn’t stop the killing. They couldn’t save the Sonderkommando either: only about 100 survived. But these documents remain as important proof of what happened during the Holocaust and evidence of the immense physical and psychological toll the Nazis exacted on the men they forced to help carry out their crimes.

    “I am not sad that I will die,” Nadjary wrote in the buried letters, “but I am sad that I won’t be able to take revenge like I would like to.” Nadjary never got a chance to exact his revenge—but by documenting his forced work on behalf of the Nazis’ Final Solution, he provided critical evidence of the magnitude of the Nazis’ murders, forever shaping the understanding of this period of history.

×